Estimating Social Variation in the Health Effects of Changes in Health Care Expenditure
James Love-Koh,
Richard Cookson,
Karl Claxton and
Susan Griffin
Additional contact information
James Love-Koh: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK
Richard Cookson: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK
Karl Claxton: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK
Susan Griffin: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, North Yorkshire, UK
Medical Decision Making, 2020, vol. 40, issue 2, 170-182
Abstract:
Background. A common aim of health expenditure is to reduce unfair inequalities in health. Although previous research has attempted to estimate the total health effects of changes in health expenditure, little is known about how changes affect different groups in the population. Methods. We propose a general framework for disaggregating the total health effects of changes in health expenditure by social groups. This can be performed indirectly when the estimate of the total health effect has first been disaggregated by a secondary factor (e.g., disease area) that can be linked to social characteristics. This is illustrated with an application to the English National Health Service. Evidence on the health effects of expenditure across 23 disease areas is combined with data on the distribution of disease-specific hospital utilization by age, sex, and area-level deprivation. Results. We find that the health effects from NHS expenditure changes are produced largely through disease areas in which individuals from more deprived areas account for a large share of health care utilization, namely, respiratory and neurologic disease and mental health. We estimate that 26% of the total health effect from a change in expenditure would accrue to the fifth of the population living in the most deprived areas, compared with 14% to the fifth living in the least deprived areas. Conclusions. Our approach can be useful for evaluating the health inequality impacts of changing health budgets or funding alternative health programs. However, it requires robust estimates of how health expenditure affects health outcomes. Our example analysis also relied on strong assumptions about the relationship between health care utilization and health effects across population groups.
Keywords: distributional cost-effectiveness analysis; health equity; health inequality; health opportunity cost (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X20904360 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:40:y:2020:i:2:p:170-182
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X20904360
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().