Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Housing Decisions for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Cross-sectional Analysis

Hélène Elidor, Ali Ben Charif, Codjo Djignefa Djade, Rhéda Adekpedjou and France Légaré
Additional contact information
Hélène Elidor: VITAM – Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
Ali Ben Charif: VITAM – Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
Codjo Djignefa Djade: VITAM – Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
Rhéda Adekpedjou: VITAM – Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada
France Légaré: VITAM – Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec, QC, Canada

Medical Decision Making, 2020, vol. 40, issue 4, 416-427

Abstract: Background . Informal caregivers are regularly faced with difficult housing decisions for older adults with cognitive impairment. They often regret the decision they made. We aimed to identify factors associated with decision regret among informal caregivers engaging in housing decisions for cognitively impaired older adults. Methods . We performed a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data collected from a cluster-randomized trial. Eligible participants were informal caregivers involved in making housing decisions for cognitively impaired older adults. Decision regret was assessed after caregivers’ enrollment in the study using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), scored from 0 to 100. We used a conceptual framework of potential predictors of regret to identify independent variables. We performed multilevel analyses using a mixed linear model by estimating fixed effects (β) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results . The mean (SD) DRS score of 296 informal caregivers (mean [SD] age, 62 [12] years) was 12.4 (18.4). Factors associated with less decision regret were having a college degree compared to primary education (β [95% CI]: –11.14 [–18.36, –3.92]), being married compared to being single (–5.60 [–10.05, –1.15]), informal caregivers’ perception that a joint process occurred (–0.14 [–0.25, –0.02]), and older adults’ not having a specific housing preference compared to preferring to stay at home (–4.13 [–7.40, –0.86]). Factors associated with more decision regret were being retired compared to being a homemaker (7.74 [1.32, 14.16]), higher burden of care (0.14 [0.05, 0.22]), and higher decisional conflict (0.51 [0.34, 0.67]). Limitations . Our analysis may not illustrate all predictors of decision regret among informal caregivers. Conclusions . Our findings will allow risk-mitigation strategies for informal caregivers at risk of experiencing regret.

Keywords: decision regret; informal caregivers; mixed linear model; shared decision making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X20925368 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:40:y:2020:i:4:p:416-427

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X20925368

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().