Calibration and Validation of the Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) Microsimulation Model Using Deep Neural Networks
Vahab Vahdat,
Oguzhan Alagoz,
Jing Voon Chen,
Leila Saoud,
Bijan J. Borah and
Paul J. Limburg
Additional contact information
Vahab Vahdat: Health Economics and Outcome Research, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA
Oguzhan Alagoz: Departments of Industrial & Systems Engineering and Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
Jing Voon Chen: Health Economics and Outcome Research, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA
Leila Saoud: Health Economics and Outcome Research, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA
Bijan J. Borah: Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
Paul J. Limburg: Health Economics and Outcome Research, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA
Medical Decision Making, 2023, vol. 43, issue 6, 719-736
Abstract:
Objectives Machine learning (ML)–based emulators improve the calibration of decision-analytical models, but their performance in complex microsimulation models is yet to be determined. Methods We demonstrated the use of an ML-based emulator with the Colorectal Cancer (CRC)-Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) model, which includes 23 unknown natural history input parameters to replicate the CRC epidemiology in the United States. We first generated 15,000 input combinations and ran the CRC-AIM model to evaluate CRC incidence, adenoma size distribution, and the percentage of small adenoma detected by colonoscopy. We then used this data set to train several ML algorithms, including deep neural network (DNN), random forest, and several gradient boosting variants (i.e., XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost) and compared their performance. We evaluated 10 million potential input combinations using the selected emulator and examined input combinations that best estimated observed calibration targets. Furthermore, we cross-validated outcomes generated by the CRC-AIM model with those made by CISNET models. The calibrated CRC-AIM model was externally validated using the United Kingdom Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial (UKFSST). Results The DNN with proper preprocessing outperformed other tested ML algorithms and successfully predicted all 8 outcomes for different input combinations. It took 473 s for the trained DNN to predict outcomes for 10 million inputs, which would have required 190 CPU-years without our DNN. The overall calibration process took 104 CPU-days, which included building the data set, training, selecting, and hyperparameter tuning of the ML algorithms. While 7 input combinations had acceptable fit to the targets, a combination that best fits all outcomes was selected as the best vector. Almost all of the predictions made by the best vector laid within those from the CISNET models, demonstrating CRC-AIM’s cross-model validity. Similarly, CRC-AIM accurately predicted the hazard ratios of CRC incidence and mortality as reported by UKFSST, demonstrating its external validity. Examination of the impact of calibration targets suggested that the selection of the calibration target had a substantial impact on model outcomes in terms of life-year gains with screening. Conclusions Emulators such as a DNN that is meticulously selected and trained can substantially reduce the computational burden of calibrating complex microsimulation models. Highlights Calibrating a microsimulation model, a process to find unobservable parameters so that the model fits observed data, is computationally complex. We used a deep neural network model, a popular machine learning algorithm, to calibrate the Colorectal Cancer Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) model. We demonstrated that our approach provides an efficient and accurate method to significantly speed up calibration in microsimulation models. The calibration process successfully provided cross-model validation of CRC-AIM against 3 established CISNET models and also externally validated against a randomized controlled trial.
Keywords: microsimulation; calibration; colorectal cancer; deep neural networks (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X231184175 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:43:y:2023:i:6:p:719-736
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X231184175
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().