Perceptions of COVID-19 Risk: How Did People Adapt to the Novel Risk?

Karen Sepucha, Aaron Rudkin, Ryan Baxter-King, Annette L. Stanton, Neil Wenger, Lynn Vavreck and Arash Naeim
Additional contact information
Karen Sepucha: Health Decision Sciences Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Aaron Rudkin: Department of Political Science, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Ryan Baxter-King: Department of Political Science, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Health Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Annette L. Stanton: Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry/Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Neil Wenger: Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Sciences Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Lynn Vavreck: Departments of Political Science and Communication, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Arash Naeim: Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Sciences Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Medical Decision Making, 2024, vol. 44, issue 2, 163-174

Abstract: Background There is limited understanding of how risk perceptions changed as the US population gained experience with COVID-19. The objectives were to examine risk perceptions and determine the factors associated with risk perceptions and how these changed over the first 18 mo of the pandemic. Methods Seven cross-sectional online surveys were fielded between May 2020 and October 2021. The study included a population-weighted sample of 138,303 US adults drawn from a market research platform, with an average 68% cooperation rate. Respondents’ risk perception of developing COVID in the next 30 days was assessed at each time point. We examined relationships between 30-day risk perceptions and various factors (including sociodemographic features, health, COVID-19 experience, political affiliation, and psychological variables). Results COVID risk perceptions were stable across the 2020 surveys and showed a significant decrease in the 2021 surveys. Several factors, including older age, worse health, high COVID worry, in-person employment type, higher income, Democratic political party affiliation (the relatively more liberal party in the United States), low tolerance of uncertainty, and high anxiety were strongly associated with higher 30-d risk perceptions in 2020. One notable change occurred in 2021, in that younger adults (aged 18–29 y) had significantly higher 30-d risk perceptions than older adults did (aged 65 y and older) after vaccination. Initial differences in perception by political party attenuated over time. Higher 30-d risk perceptions were significantly associated with engaging in preventive behaviors. Limitations Cross-sectional samples, risk perception item focused on incidence not severity. Conclusions COVID risk perceptions decreased over time. Understanding the longitudinal pattern of risk perceptions and the factors associated with 30-d risk perceptions over time provides valuable insights to guide public health communication campaigns. Highlights The study assessed COVID-19 risk perceptions at 7 time points over 18 mo of the pandemic in large samples of US adults. Risk perceptions were fairly stable until the introduction of vaccines in early 2021, at which point they showed a marked reduction. Higher COVID-19 30-d risk perceptions were significantly associated with the preventive behaviors of masking, limiting social contact, avoiding restaurants, and not entertaining visitors at home.

Keywords: COVID-19; risk perception; coronavirus; preventive health behaviors; longitudinal data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X231221448 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:44:y:2024:i:2:p:163-174

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X231221448

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().