Methodological Approaches for Incorporating Marginalized Populations into HPV Vaccine Modeling: A Systematic Review

Jennifer C. Spencer, Juan Yanguela, Lisa P. Spees, Olufeyisayo O. Odebunmi, Anna A. Ilyasova, Caitlin B. Biddell, Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Sarah D. Mills, Colleen R. Higgins, Sachiko Ozawa and Stephanie B. Wheeler
Additional contact information
Jennifer C. Spencer: Department of Population Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
Juan Yanguela: Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Lisa P. Spees: Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Olufeyisayo O. Odebunmi: Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Anna A. Ilyasova: School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Caitlin B. Biddell: Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Kristen Hassmiller Lich: Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Sarah D. Mills: Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Colleen R. Higgins: Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Sachiko Ozawa: Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Stephanie B. Wheeler: Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Medical Decision Making, 2025, vol. 45, issue 4, 358-369

Abstract: Background. Delineation of historically marginalized populations in decision models can identify strategies to improve equity but requires assumptions in both model structure and stratification of input data. Purpose. We sought to characterize alternative methodological approaches for incorporating marginalized populations into human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine decision-support models. Data Sources. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Embase from January 2006 through June 2022. Study Selection. We identified simulation models of HPV vaccination that refine any model input to specifically reflect a marginalized population. Data Extraction. We extracted data on key methodological decisions across modeling approaches to incorporate marginalized populations, including stratification of inputs, model structure, attribution of prevaccine disparities, calibration, validation, and sensitivity analyses. Data Synthesis. We identified 30 models that stratified inputs by sexual behavior (i.e., men who have sex with men), HIV infection status, race, ethnicity, income, rurality, or combinations of these. We identified 5 common approaches used to incorporate marginalized groups. These included models based primarily on differences in sexual behavior (k = 6), HPV cancer incidence (k = 10), cancer screening and care access (k = 4), and HPV natural history (through either direct incorporation of data [k = 10] or calibration [k = 5]). Few models evaluated sensitivity around their conceptualization of the marginalized group, and only 5 models validated outcomes for the marginalized group. Limitations. Evaluated studies reflected a variety of settings and research questions, making it difficult to evaluate the implications of differences across modeling approaches. Conclusions. Modelers should be explicit about the assumptions and theory driving their model structure and input parameters specific to key marginalized populations, such as the causes of prevaccination differences in outcomes. More emphasis is needed on model validation and rigorous sensitivity analysis. Highlights We identified 30 unique HPV vaccination models that incorporated marginalized populations, including populations living with HIV, low-income or rural populations, and individuals of a marginalized race, ethnicity, or sexual behavior. Methods for incorporating these populations, as well as the assumptions inherent in the modeling structure and parameter selections, varied substantially, with models explicitly or implicitly attributing prevaccine differences to alternative combinations of biological, behavioral, and societal mechanisms. Modelers seeking to incorporate marginalized populations should be transparent about assumptions underlying model structure and data and examine these assumptions in sensitivity analysis when possible.

Keywords: Human papillomavirus; simulation modeling; vaccination; cervical cancer; equity; calibration; health care access; systematic review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X251325509 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:4:p:358-369

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X251325509

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().