Cancer Patients’ Experiences of Burden when Involved in Treatment Decision Making

Fiorella L. Huijgens, Marij A. Hillen, Mette J. Huisinga, André N. Vis, Corinne N. Tillier, Hester S. A. Oldenburg, Gwen M. P. Diepenhorst and Inge Henselmans
Additional contact information
Fiorella L. Huijgens: Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Marij A. Hillen: Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Mette J. Huisinga: Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
André N. Vis: Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Corinne N. Tillier: Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Hester S. A. Oldenburg: Division of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Gwen M. P. Diepenhorst: Division of Surgical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Inge Henselmans: Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Medical Decision Making, 2025, vol. 45, issue 5, 533-544

Abstract: Purpose Patients are increasingly involved in decision making by their clinicians. Yet, there are concerns that involvement in decision making may cause emotional distress in patients. Little research has examined the nature of the burden experienced by patients confronted with a life-changing treatment decision. Therefore, we explored the nature and manifestations of burden experienced by patients with early-stage breast and prostate cancer regarding their involvement in decision making. We further aimed to identify patient-perceived causes and potential solutions for their experienced burden. Methods We used semi-structured interviews to explore the perspectives of patients with early-stage breast and prostate cancer. Patients ( N = 24) were eligible if they were diagnosed in the past 6 mo and reported some degree of burden regarding their involvement in decision making. Two researchers independently inductively coded the interviews using thematic analysis. Results Patients described being burdened by the decision in various ways and at various moments in the decision-making process. Patients attributed their decision-related burden mainly to uncertainty, fear of making the wrong decision, insufficient guidance by their clinician, and feeling an overwhelming sense of responsibility for their treatment decision. Patients indicated various factors that mitigated their burden or facilitated decision making, including having sufficient time, the opportunity to discuss the choice with experts and/or family, and receiving advice or confirmation from family or the clinician. Conclusion These findings suggest that decision-related burden could be caused by the uncertainty and anxiety patients experience and by a nonpreferred division of roles within the decision-making process. Implications Accordingly, acknowledging patients’ feelings by discussing the presence of uncertainty and distress might normalize the burden for patients. Moreover, clinicians could explore and adjust to patients’ role preference in decision making and discuss what would facilitate the decision process for patients. Highlights Patients experience emotional, cognitive, and physical burden from their involvement in decision making. Some of the burden appears to result from the way clinicians involve patients in decision making. In addition to information about options, benefits, and harms, patients require active support in their decision-making process. Clinicians could aim to avoid overfocus on patient autonomy and instead establish authentic, shared decisions, with a role for some clinician control if needed.

Keywords: decision making; patient-perceived burden; uncertainty; responsibility; patient-clinician communication (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X251334979 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:5:p:533-544

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X251334979

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().