An Experimental Investigation of Treatment Decisions under Ambiguity and Conflict

Yiyun Shou, Amelia Gulliver, Louise M Farrer, Amy Dawel, Eryn Newman and Michael Smithson
Additional contact information
Yiyun Shou: School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Australia
Amelia Gulliver: Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Australia
Louise M Farrer: Centre for Mental Health Research, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, Australia
Amy Dawel: School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Australia
Eryn Newman: School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Australia
Michael Smithson: School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Australia

Medical Decision Making, 2025, vol. 45, issue 7, 892-903

Abstract: Introduction Effective risk communication is essential for medical professionals to assist patients to make informed decisions. However, risk communication can be challenging as patients receive ambiguous and conflicting information. Objectives This study aimed to examine how uncertainty influences individuals’ perceptions and preferences and interacts with message framing in a medical treatment decision scenario. Methods The present study included a large representative sample of Australians ( N = 805). A randomized experiment was conducted presenting a scenario about hypothetical COVID-19 treatment alternatives with varying uncertainty and framing in treatment information. Results The results showed that conflicting information and loss framing had deleterious effects on participants’ willingness to take a treatment and trust in the sources providing the information, compared with information that was precise, ambiguous, or in a gain frame. The effects could be stronger among participants who are risk averse, anxious, and native language speakers. Conclusion The findings highlight that patients may be more averse to a treatment option and reduce their trust in medical professionals when they are provided with ambiguous information and particularly when information that conflicts with other sources including other medical professionals. It is important for medical professionals to be aware of other information patients have sourced that may conflict with information provided by the medical professionals during the consultation and to assist patients with high levels of risk aversion and anxiety in their decision making. Highlights Conflicting information and loss framing had deleterious effects on participants’ willingness to take a treatment. Conflicting information and loss framing also reduced participants’ trust in the sources of the information. The deleterious effects were stronger among participants who were native language speakers and were risk averse and anxious.

Keywords: uncertainty; conflict; ambiguity; risk communication; treatment decision (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X251346853 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:45:y:2025:i:7:p:892-903

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X251346853

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().