The Superiority of Sequential Over Simultaneous Testing

Peter M. Doubilet and Kevin C. Cain

Medical Decision Making, 1985, vol. 5, issue 4, 447-451

Abstract: Diagnostic tests are typically used to help the physician select among available management options. When two or more tests are available, using them sequentially is potentially more efficient than simultaneously performing multiple tests, in that the former approach may allow the physician to perform fewer tests. In particular, we demonstrate that if two common conditions are met, any simultaneous strategy involving at least as many tests as management options can be replaced by a sequential strategy with the same outcome and a smaller expected number of tests. It follows that, in many clinical situations in which the benefits of performing fewer tests outweigh the costs that may result from delaying diagnosis, simultaneous strategies cannot be optimal. This result can decrease the number of diagnostic strategies that the physician or decision analyst needs to consider. (Med Decis Making 5:447-451, 1985)

Date: 1985
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X8500500406 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:5:y:1985:i:4:p:447-451

DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8500500406

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Medical Decision Making
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().