 Relation of Observer Agreement to Accuracy According to a Two-receiver Signal Detection Model of DiagnosisMichael F. Quinn Medical Decision Making, 1989, vol. 9, issue 3, 196-206 Abstract: A long-standing problem of medical diagnosis is why rates of observer disagreement are so high. To study this question a model of test interpretation is defined which accounts for disagreement when observers use identical diagnostic strategies. Test subjects are assigned to one of two disease classes on the basis of two parameters: the test score and A, the diagnostic certainty, a parameter analogous to signal-to-noise ratio. The rate of disagreement and the mean error rate of independent ideal observers are derived as a function of diagnostic strategy. It follows from the model that: 1) Maximization of the ratio of disagreement to error defines an optimal diagnostic strategy with advantages over maximum likelihood and Bayes diagnostic strategies. 2) Disagreement exceeds error if the sensitivity and specificity of in dependent observers exceed one-half for all A. 3) The ratio of disagreement to error can be no greater than two if test interpretation is dichotomous but can approach infinity for tricho tomous interpretation, i.e., if observers are allowed to interpret cases as indeterminate. Keywords: Key words: Bayesian statistics; maximum likelihood; signal-to-noise ratio. (Med Decis Making 1989; 9:196-206) (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:medema:v:9:y:1989:i:3:p:196-206 DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8900900308 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Medical Decision Making |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.