“Aggregative†and “Deliberative†Decision-Making Procedures: A Comparison of Two Southern Italian Factories

Lucio Baccaro

Politics & Society, 2001, vol. 29, issue 2, 243-271

Abstract: By comparing developments in two southern Italian factories, this article contrasts “aggregative†(vote on alternative options) and “deliberative†(vote preceded by discussion) procedures in trade unions. In one of the plants, the preferences of some of the workers appear to have been changed by deliberation. The process of rational persuasion seems to have required, however, more than sheer circulation of information. Based on this evidence, the article argues that when a potential conflict of interests is involved, speakers need to provide evidence that they are animated by a “communicative†rather than “strategic†intent. This implies validating their implicit claim to sincerity of communication.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329201029002004 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:29:y:2001:i:2:p:243-271

DOI: 10.1177/0032329201029002004

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().