The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science

David D. Laitin

Politics & Society, 2003, vol. 31, issue 1, 163-184

Abstract: Political science faces a challenge from a “Mr. Perestroika,†who decries the hegemony of formal and statistical analysis in the discipline. Although not connected with this movement, Bent Flyvbjerg makes the best case for a renewed dominance for qualitative and case study work throughout the social sciences. This article challenges Flyvbjerg’s call for a phronetic as opposed to an epistemic discipline. It challenges as well the unqualified call for pluralism advocated by many in the perestroika movement. It offers instead an integrated tripartite method in which narrative, statistics, and formal modeling fill in a scientific frame.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329202250167 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:31:y:2003:i:1:p:163-184

DOI: 10.1177/0032329202250167

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().