A Swedish-Style Welfare State or Basic Income: Which Should Have Priority?

Barbara Bergmann

Politics & Society, 2004, vol. 32, issue 1, 107-118

Abstract: State provision of “merit goods†and of narrowly targeted cash payments has higher priority than large universal cash grants. Analysis of the Swedish budget shows that advanced countries do not have the taxing capacity to do both at once. Other problems with cash payments schemes include the disincentive to work for pay, reducing taxpaying capacity, and retrograde effects on gender equality. After the achievement of a welfare state, rises over time in productivity may gradually open up room in the national budget for universal cash payments.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329203261101 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:32:y:2004:i:1:p:107-118

DOI: 10.1177/0032329203261101

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().