Problems and Prospects for Democratic Settlements: South Africa as a Model for the Middle East and Northern Ireland?

Courtney Jung, Ellen Lust-Okar and Ian Shapiro
Additional contact information
Courtney Jung: Graduate Faculty of New School University, jung@newschool.edu
Ellen Lust-Okar: Graduate Faculty of New School University, ellen.lust-okar@yale.edu
Ian Shapiro: Graduate Faculty of New School University, ian.shapiro@yale.edu

Politics & Society, 2005, vol. 33, issue 2, 277-326

Abstract: Intense ethnic, racial, and religious violence led many to classify South Africa, Northern Ireland, and Israel/Palestine as intractable conflicts. Yet they diverged, with only South Africa achieving a lasting settlement. The authors explain why. The authors analyze them as a distinctive type of negotiated transition. The ancién regime is an imperfect democracy, subject to electoral constraints and legitimated by democratic principles that it violates. This constrains negotiations but helps manage difficult commitment problems. The authors show how the principals navigated constraints and took advantage of opportunities in South Africa but have failed—so far—to do so in the other two conflicts.

Keywords: South Africa; Israel-Palestine; Northern Ireland; democratic transition; negotiations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329205275196 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:33:y:2005:i:2:p:277-326

DOI: 10.1177/0032329205275196

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().