Digging in the Archives: The Promise and Perils of Primary Documents

Michele Leiby
Additional contact information
Michele Leiby: Department of Political Science at the University of New Mexico, mleiby@unm.edu

Politics & Society, 2009, vol. 37, issue 1, 75-99

Abstract: This article explores the methodological obstacles to research on wartime sexual violence and the extent to which they can be overcome with archival research. It discusses issues of concept formation, counting victims of human rights abuse, and coding violations. It compares figures from the Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission's final report, an analysis of the Commission's published materials, and an analysis of the primary documents and finds that (1) the number of reported cases of sexual violence is significantly higher than the 538 cited by the Commission, (2) men were more often the targets of sexual violence than previously thought, and (3) sexual humiliation and sexual torture were common practices during the war.

Keywords: sexual violence; rape; war; archives; Peru (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329208329754 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:37:y:2009:i:1:p:75-99

DOI: 10.1177/0032329208329754

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().