Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation among the Disempowered

Christopher F. Karpowitz, Chad Raphael and Allen S. Hammond Iv
Additional contact information
Christopher F. Karpowitz: Brigham Young University, Provo, UT
Chad Raphael: Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA,craphael@scu.edu
Allen S. Hammond Iv: Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA

Politics & Society, 2009, vol. 37, issue 4, 576-615

Abstract: Deliberative democracy grounds its legitimacy largely in the ability of speakers to participate on equal terms. Yet theorists and practitioners have struggled with how to establish deliberative equality in the face of stark differences of power in liberal democracies. Designers of innovative civic forums for deliberation often aim to neutralize inequities among participants through proportional inclusion of disempowered speakers and discourses. In contrast, others argue that democratic equality is best achieved when disempowered groups deliberate in their own enclaves (interest groups, parties, and movements) before entering the broader public sphere. Borrowing from each perspective, the authors argue that there are strong reasons to incorporate enclave deliberation among the disempowered within civic forums. They support this claim by presenting case study evidence showing that participants in such forums can gain some of the same benefits of deliberation found in more heterogeneous groups (e.g., political knowledge, efficacy and trust), can consider a diversity of viewpoints rather than falling into groupthink and polarization, and can persuade external stakeholders of the legitimacy of the group’s deliberations.

Keywords: deliberation; equality; power; group polarization; civic engagement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329209349226 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:37:y:2009:i:4:p:576-615

DOI: 10.1177/0032329209349226

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().