Economic Ideas and the Political Process: Debating Tax Cuts in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1962-1981

Elizabeth Popp Berman and Nicholas Pagnucco
Additional contact information
Elizabeth Popp Berman: University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY, USA, epberman@albany.edu
Nicholas Pagnucco: University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY, USA, np6144@albany.edu

Politics & Society, 2010, vol. 38, issue 3, 347-372

Abstract: While sociologists and political scientists have become interested in the role of ideas in the political process, relatively little work looks at how ideological claims are actually deployed in political discourse. This article examines the economic claims made in two pairs of Congressional debates over tax cuts, one (in 1962 and 1964) generally associated with Keynesian economic theories, and one (in 1978 and 1981) tied to supply-side ideas. While these bills were indeed initiated by groups subscribing to different economic ideologies, subsequent debates look surprisingly similar. The bills were closer in substance than one might expect, and while their proponents came from opposite political camps, in both cases supporters focused more on supply-side than demand-side effects and emphasized tax cuts’ ability to pay for themselves through economic stimulation. The authors propose that politically acceptable economic claims may evolve more slowly than the economic theories that inspire policy entrepreneurs, and that this “discursive opportunity structure†may not only constrain the political process but may potentially shape the political effects of expert knowledge.

Keywords: ideas; discourse; Congress; Keynesianism; supply-side economics; taxes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329210373070 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:38:y:2010:i:3:p:347-372

DOI: 10.1177/0032329210373070

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().