EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Politicization of Religion: Political Catholicism and Political Islam in Comparative Perspective

Ateş Altınordu
Additional contact information
Ateş Altınordu: Sabancı University, Istanbul, Turkey, atesaltinordu@sabanciuniv.edu

Politics & Society, 2010, vol. 38, issue 4, 517-551

Abstract: While religious politics have been a widely discussed topic in the social sciences in recent decades, few studies develop general explanations based on systematic and detailed comparative analysis. This article seeks to explain when and how successful religious parties rise. To that end, I comparatively analyze the politicization of German Catholicism in the second half of the nineteenth century (1848—1878) and Turkish Islam in the post-1970 period (1970—2002) and briefly examine the negative case of nineteenth-century German Protestantism. According to the theory of revival-reaction-politicization I propose, successful religious parties rise when major religious revivals confront social counter-mobilization and state repression, provided that existing political parties do not effectively represent religious defense. The study's findings challenge the pervasive tendency to treat Christian and Islamic politics as incommensurable.

Keywords: religious parties; religion and politics; Catholicism; Islam (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329210381238 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:38:y:2010:i:4:p:517-551

DOI: 10.1177/0032329210381238

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:38:y:2010:i:4:p:517-551