The Political Contradictions of Incremental Innovation: Lessons from Pharmaceutical Patent Examination in Brazil

Kenneth C. Shadlen
Additional contact information
Kenneth C. Shadlen: London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK, k.shadlen@lse.ac.uk

Politics & Society, 2011, vol. 39, issue 2, 143-174

Abstract: Neodevelopmental patent regimes aim to facilitate local actors’ access to knowledge and also encourage incremental innovations. The case of pharmaceutical patent examination in Brazil illustrates political contradictions between these objectives. Brazil’s patent law includes the Ministry of Health in the examination of pharmaceutical patent applications. Though widely celebrated as a health-oriented policy, the Brazilian experience has become fraught with tensions and subject to decreasing levels of both stability and enforcement. I show how one pillar of the neodevelopmental regime, the array of initiatives to encourage incremental innovations, has fostered the acquisition of innovative capabilities in the Brazilian pharmaceutical sector, and how these new capabilities have altered actors’ policy preferences and thus contributed to the erosion of the coalition in support of the other pillar of the neodevelopmental regime, the health-oriented approach to examining pharmaceutical patents. The analysis of capability-derived preference formation points to an endogenous process of coalitional change.

Keywords: Brazil; innovation; causal mechanisms; patents; pharmaceuticals (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329211402601 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:39:y:2011:i:2:p:143-174

DOI: 10.1177/0032329211402601

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().