EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Dispersed Constituency Democracy

David Ciepley

Politics & Society, 2013, vol. 41, issue 1, 135-162

Abstract: In multiethnic and multi-religious democracies, the chronic danger is that candidates will engage in “identity politics,†appealing to one locally preponderant ethnic group against other groups. The usual formulas for composing multiethnic democracies—ethnic federalism and/or proportional representation—often exacerbate the problem, ethnicizing political campaigns and carving up the national legislature into ethnic blocs, each beholden only to its own group. An alternative approach—what I call “dispersed constituency democracy†—is to match each legislative seat with a constituency that reflects the overall ethnic composition of the society in question, so as to encourage candidates to reach across ethnic divisions rather than play to locally preponderant ones. I propose a simple way to do this, and explore the likely consequences for national electoral campaigns and legislative dynamics over a range of demographic circumstances. I also consider supplemental devices for protecting minority rights that would be made possible by the proposed constituency system.

Keywords: democracy; ethnic conflict; ethnic federalism; dispersed constituency; deterritorialize (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329213475585 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:41:y:2013:i:1:p:135-162

DOI: 10.1177/0032329213475585

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:41:y:2013:i:1:p:135-162