Group Lending, Joint Liability, and Social Capital

Antara Haldar and Joseph Stiglitz
Additional contact information
Antara Haldar: University of Cambridge

Politics & Society, 2016, vol. 44, issue 4, 459-497

Abstract: This article grapples with the causes of India’s microfinance crisis. By contrasting Bangladesh’s highly successful Grameen model with the allegedly “universalizable†version of India’s SKS Microfinance (which precipitated the crisis), trust or social capital is isolated—not just narrowly interpreted within standard economic theory, but more broadly construed—as the essential element accounting for the early success of microfinance. It is argued that the microfinance experience has been widely misinterpreted, in both analytical and policy terms. This article suggests inherent limits in extending the model to for-profit institutions and, in particular, to the pace of scaling up.

Keywords: microfinance; microfinance and social capital; Indian microfinance crisis; microfinance for-profit; Asia; India (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329216674001 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:44:y:2016:i:4:p:459-497

DOI: 10.1177/0032329216674001

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().