Random Assemblies for Lawmaking? Prospects and Limits*

James S. Fishkin

Politics & Society, 2018, vol. 46, issue 3, 359-379

Abstract: A randomly selected microcosm of the people can usefully play an official role in the lawmaking process. However, there are serious issues to be confronted if such a random sample were to take on the role of a full-scale, full-time second chamber. Some skeptical considerations are detailed. There are also advantages to short convenings of such a sample to take on some of the roles of a second chamber. This article provides a response to the skeptical considerations. Precedents from ancient Athens show how such short-term convenings of a deliberating microcosm can be positioned before, during, or after other elements of the lawmaking process. The article draws on experience from Deliberative Polling to show how this is both practical and productive for the lawmaking process.

Keywords: Athens; corruption; Deliberative Polling; elections; minipublics; nomothetai; representative democracy; sortition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032329218789889 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:polsoc:v:46:y:2018:i:3:p:359-379

DOI: 10.1177/0032329218789889

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Politics & Society
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().