Contemporary Marxist Theory and Practice: A Feminist Critique

Heidi I. Hartmann and Ann R. Markusen
Additional contact information
Heidi I. Hartmann: National Academy of Sciences National Research Council Washington
Ann R. Markusen: Dept. of City and Regional Planning Institute of Urban and Regional Development University of California Berkeley

Review of Radical Political Economics, 1980, vol. 12, issue 2, 87-94

Abstract: Both Marxist theory and practice continue to ignore, for the most part, recent developments in feminist theory and practice. Feminist theory chal lenges a definition of production as narrowly confined to the production of com modities that is commonly used in much Marxist literature, examines the pro duction and reproduction of people under patriarchal relations, and focuses on the conflicts that arise between women and men because of their differing rela tions to these two types of production. Feminist practice emphasizes building consensus strategies, supporting women in their individual struggles (because women in their homes tend to face patriarchy as individuals), and helping each woman feel both her oppression and her power. The value of this strategy is largely misunderstood by the left. Feminist practice is as revolutionary as class struggle, but its object is different — the destruction of patriarchy. The antipathy of much of the left toward feminism seems to stem from a misuse of Mao's notion of "principal contradiction" as requiring a class-first strategy. In the contempor ary U.S. the "principal contradiction" encompasses class, gender, race, ethnic and age conflict. Moreover, a struggle aimed primarily at gender domination may destroy class domination as well.

Date: 1980
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/048661348001200210 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:12:y:1980:i:2:p:87-94

DOI: 10.1177/048661348001200210

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Radical Political Economics from Union for Radical Political Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().