Divide and Conquer in Australia: A Study of Labor Segmentation

Robert Drago
Additional contact information
Robert Drago: Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Review of Radical Political Economics, 1995, vol. 27, issue 1, 25-70

Abstract: This study uses a sample of 982 Australian workplaces to ascertain whether labor segmentation affects the Australian economy. Cluster analysis allocates private-sector workplaces among the primary independent, primary subordinate and secondary segments. I then test whether segment location predicts other facets of the workplace, and whether the two primary segments significantly diverge. The majority of such tests overwhelmingly support the argument that the hypothesized segments exist and help explain the functioning of workplaces. The evidence also suggests that various divide-and-conquer strategies are often applied by Australian firms to reduce worker solidarity and that conditions for employees in the primary segments have recently deteriorated while innovative employee relations techniques have simultaneously emerged. (JEL nos. J41, J42, J50)

Date: 1995
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/048661349502700103 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:27:y:1995:i:1:p:25-70

DOI: 10.1177/048661349502700103

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Radical Political Economics from Union for Radical Political Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().