Social Relations, Commodity-Fetishism and Marx's Critique of Political Economy

Massimo De Angelis
Additional contact information
Massimo De Angelis: Department of Economics, University of East London, Longbridge Road, Dagenham, Essex RM8 2AS, massimo@uel.ac.uk

Review of Radical Political Economics, 1996, vol. 28, issue 4, 1-29

Abstract: Starting from Marx's theory of value and commodity-fetishism, I address the question of how fetishised categories of bourgeois economics are organically linked with the reality of the capitalist class relation of work and of class struggle. The paper is thus structured. I first point out that Marx's critique sees the limitation of classical political economy in the confusion between "substance" and "form" (the case of Smith) or in the inadequate treatment of "substance" and therefore the lack of a theory of "form" (Ricardo). I then discuss Marx's notion of substance of value and relate it to his theory of commodity-fetishism. In this discussion my central reference point is the category of abstract labor as a social relation. Consequently, I discuss the category of commodity-fetishism as cognitive apprehension of this social relation from a particular class perspective, that of capital. I go on to critically evaluate Rubin's interpretation of Marx's theory of fetishism in light of my interpretation of commodity-fetishism and its relation to the category of value. I then illustrate my argument by using the theory of commodity-fetishism to shed light on the social meaning of some economic categories. Finally, I move beyond Marx and suggest a general theoretical understanding of the evolution of economic theory in relation to these struggles and in the organic connection with the capitalist relation of work.

Date: 1996
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/048661349602800401 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:28:y:1996:i:4:p:1-29

DOI: 10.1177/048661349602800401

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Radical Political Economics from Union for Radical Political Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().