EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Going global: differential accumulation and the great U-turn in South Africa and Israel

Jonathan Nitzan () and Shimshon Bichler
Additional contact information
Shimshon Bichler: POB 4283, Jerusalem, 91-042, Israel tookie@inter.net.il

Review of Radical Political Economics, 2001, vol. 33, issue 1, 21-55

Abstract: This paper offers a new theoretical approach for comparing the current political-economic U-turns in South Africa and Israel. Our principal focus is on a revised notion of capital, emphasizing the central role of differential accumulation by dominant capital groups. We further distinguish between an antagonistic "depth" regime in which differential accumulation is achieved via stagflation, and a less conflictual "breadth" regime where redistribution occurs through growth. Within this framework, we argue that both the recent transition in the two countries, as well as their former regimes, were greatly affected by global developments. Until the 1980s, accumulation in both countries depended largely on depth, characterized by a marked disparity between deepening crisis on the one hand, and rapid differential accumulation on the other. In South Africa, the large companies benefited disproportionately from the impact on gold profit of global inflation, and were therefore reluctant to abandon apartheid. Similarly, Israel's leading firms recorded spectacular gains riding the global arms race and regional conflict, and hence voiced little opposition to the continuation of a war economy at home. Recently, however, these global forces went into reverse, triggering in both countries a shift from depth to breadth. The disinflation associated with rapid globalization undermined gold profit in South Africa, while the end of the Cold War pulled the rug from under the global arms race, drying up the flow of war profit in Israel. In these new conditions, dominant capital groups in the two countries can sustain their differential accumulation only by investing outside their own borders. Capital mobility, though, requires political-economic stability, hence the support of these groups for democracy in South Africa and to regional reconciliation in Israel.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://rrp.sagepub.com/content/33/1/21.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: Going Global: Differential Accumulation and the Great U-turn in South Africa and Israel (2001) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:33:y:2001:i:1:p:21-55

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Radical Political Economics from Union for Radical Political Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2021-08-08
Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:33:y:2001:i:1:p:21-55