Golden Age versus Golden Rule: Capitalists versus Workers in Growth Theory

Frank Thompson

Review of Radical Political Economics, 2003, vol. 35, issue 1, 3-17

Abstract: Golden Age steady states determined by saving rates maximizing profit are contrasted with the Golden Rule, that is, consumption maximizing, steady states highlighted in standard economic growth theory. Golden Rule steady states exemplify the classical socialist principle of distribution: to each according to work. Under the Golden Rule, consumption equals labor income, and given stationary class capital ownership shares, all profit must be invested and none consumed. In contrast, in Golden Age steady states, some profit can be freed for consumption, although the levels of investment, output, and most notably consumption are then all lower. These relationships are explored in models initially without, and then with, labor force growth and technical change.

Keywords: economic growth; distribution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0486613402250173 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:35:y:2003:i:1:p:3-17

DOI: 10.1177/0486613402250173

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Radical Political Economics from Union for Radical Political Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().