How Well Are We Measuring Workers’ Rights?

L. Josh Bivens, Adam S. Hersh and Christian Weller ()
Additional contact information
L. Josh Bivens: Economic Policy Institute, 1660 L Street NW, Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20036, USA, lbivens@epinet.org
Adam S. Hersh: University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Department of Economics, Amherst, MA 01003, USA, ahersh@econs.umass.edu

Review of Radical Political Economics, 2005, vol. 37, issue 3, 302-310

Abstract: The literature overwhelmingly supports the proposition that high-quality domestic institutions are a precondition for economic growth. Political freedoms have been shown to contribute to this institutional quality. A smaller literature suggests that the adoption and enforcement of core labor standards (CLS) that protect the rights of workers can be an important boon for economic development. This article aims to lay a stronger groundwork for the literature linking workers’ rights and economic outcomes by examining more closely some of the proxies that have been used to measure these rights. Our results suggest that the ratification of CLS is only weakly correlated with the improvement of broader political freedoms. The figures also show some link between CLS ratification and proxies for actual rights enjoyed by workers.

Keywords: economic growth; labor standards; institutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://rrp.sagepub.com/content/37/3/302.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:37:y:2005:i:3:p:302-310

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Radical Political Economics from Union for Radical Political Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().