Urban Inequality, Neoliberalism, and the Case for a Multidisciplinary Economics

Tim Koechlin
Additional contact information
Tim Koechlin: International Studies and Urban Studies, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA

Review of Radical Political Economics, 2014, vol. 46, issue 4, 451-460

Abstract: This paper begins by chronicling the stunning inequality (economic and other) that characterizes the U.S. economy and U.S. cities. The development of cities in the United States in recent decades is linked quite essentially to the dynamics and contradictions of U.S. capitalism, including a policy agenda that has been pro-capital and anti-urban. The penultimate section of the paper shows that neoclassical theory – with its focus on “choice†– provides a deeply inadequate explanation of urban inequality. And yet neoclassicism, along with its cruder relative, neoliberalism, has continued to shape the narrative of U.S. cities. The final section argues for a “multidisciplinary economics†that recognizes that a rich urban economics requires insights from political science, sociology, geography, and other academic disciplines.

Keywords: urban economics; inequality; U.S. cities; neoliberalism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: B5 D3 P25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://rrp.sagepub.com/content/46/4/451.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:46:y:2014:i:4:p:451-460

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Radical Political Economics from Union for Radical Political Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().