Understanding the Significance of EFL Students’ Perceptions and Preferences of Written Corrective Feedback

Ushba Rasool, Jiancheng Qian and Muhammad Zammad Aslam

SAGE Open, 2024, vol. 14, issue 2, 21582440241256562

Abstract: Language instructors worldwide use various types and strategies for providing feedback on the learners’ written production. Written corrective feedback (WCF) plays a vital role in systematically learning second or other languages. Additionally, students’ perception of feedback and its delivery has a specific value. Therefore, the current study examined perceptions and preferences of the WCF of EFL students they received in high school back in their home countries. However, the data was collected when they were studying in China as international students. To achieve these objectives, the researchers utilized a self-administered questionnaire and collected data from 91 international students at Chinese University, China. The results showed that most students supported positive statements (in the first part of the questionnaire) regarding WCF perceptions. The most preferred types were direct and unfocused WCF. Also, in order to establish a statistical basis on whether there are differences among various nationalities in terms of their perception, One-way ANOVA was performed. The findings displayed that all nationalities have difference in positive perceptions, and same tendency toward negative perceptions about WCF and focused feedback. Overall, according to their answers, WCF helps them to know what to avoid and adapt to compose an effective writing piece.

Keywords: students’ perceptions; students’ preferences; WCF; feedback strategies; EFL students (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241256562 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241256562

DOI: 10.1177/21582440241256562

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in SAGE Open
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().