Why Simulation Games Work-In Search of the Active Substance: A Synthesis

Gert Jan Hofstede, Léon de Caluwé and Vincent Peters
Additional contact information
Gert Jan Hofstede: Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands, Delft University, Delft, the Netherlands, gertjan.hofstede@wur.nl
Léon de Caluwé: Twynstra Gudde, Amersfoort, the Netherlands, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, lca@tg.nl
Vincent Peters: Samenspraak Advies, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, Vincent@samenspraakadvies.nl

Simulation & Gaming, 2010, vol. 41, issue 6, 824-843

Abstract: In this article, the authors reflect on the question why simulation games are such an effective tool for learning. The article is based on the authors’ experience and that of many other practitioners in the field. The article posits that it is the confluence of systemic knowledge, practice, emotional involvement, and social embeddedness that creates the potential to achieve results that no other methods can match. A simulation game run constitutes a bout of individual and collective purposeful action by an individual or a group formed specifically for that purpose. People have evolved to be supremely good at just that. Simulation games can teach systemic knowledge, and they can enable participants to try out organizational changes. This potential is not always realized, however. Game runs are “alive†and variable, and this is a risky strength. They activate not only the explicit rules but also the hidden cultural rules of the participants. This can lead to memorable learning as well as to frustration, particularly when games are used across cultures. The article specifies reasons why games could fail and offers ways to avoid these pitfalls. It shows that experience and craftsmanship are needed in game design, facilitation, and debriefing.

Keywords: culture; effectiveness of simulation gaming; emotional involvement; facilitation; fail factors for simulation games; game design; Homo ludens; learning; magic circle; practitioners; simulation games; social embeddedness; strengths of simulation games; systemic knowledge (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878110375596 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:simgam:v:41:y:2010:i:6:p:824-843

DOI: 10.1177/1046878110375596

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Simulation & Gaming
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().