Limits to Modeling: Balancing Ambition and Outcome in Astrophysics and Cosmology

Stéphanie Ruphy
Additional contact information
Stéphanie Ruphy: Université de Provence (Aix-Marseille I), France, stephanie.ruphy@wanadoo.fr

Simulation & Gaming, 2011, vol. 42, issue 2, 177-194

Abstract: Computer simulations of complex physical objects and processes for which data are very sparse or inexistent have become a major tool of scientific investigation in astrophysics and cosmology. However, one must ask how these simulations acquire their epistemic credentials and whether their realistic ambition is legitimate. A close look at two model-building processes—one in galactic astrophysics, the other in cosmology—reveals heretofore underappreciated features of simulations, such as path dependency. This article argues that such features undermine our confidence in the outcomes of the simulation. Case studies presented here reveal a general tension in computer simulation between realistic ambitions and the possibility of empirical confirmation. The analysis will thus lead to a reassessment of the epistemic goals actually achieved by composite models of complex astrophysical and cosmological phenomena.

Keywords: astrophysics; Big Bang model; computer simulation; contingency; cosmology; galaxy; limitations; model; modeling; path dependency; pluralism; realism; underdetermination (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878108319640 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:simgam:v:42:y:2011:i:2:p:177-194

DOI: 10.1177/1046878108319640

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Simulation & Gaming
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().