Simulating the Camp David Negotiations
Sean F. McMahon and
Chris Miller
Simulation & Gaming, 2013, vol. 44, issue 1, 134-150
Abstract:
This article reflects critically on simulations. Building on the authors’ experience simulating the Palestinian-Israeli-American Camp David negotiations of 2000, they argue that simulations are useful pedagogical tools that encourage creative—but not critical—thinking and constructivist learning. However, they can also have the deleterious effect of reproducing unequal power relations in the classroom. The authors develop this argument in five stages: They distinguish between problem solving and critical theory and define critical thinking —something not done by the simulation orthodoxy. They describe the Camp David simulation. This is their contribution to the relatively small corpus of literature on simulating Palestinian-Israeli relations. They review the constructivist learning and peer teaching accomplished through their simulation. This section is notable because it is authored by a graduate student who participated in the simulation as a meaning maker. They review the manner in which simulations promote creative, not critical, thinking, and reproduce asymmetrical power relations. They reflect on the overall utility of simulating the Camp David negotiations in the classroom.
Keywords: Asymmetrical power relations; Bill Clinton; Camp David; collaborative problem-solving; constructivist learning; creative thinking; critical pedagogy; critical theory; critical thinking; discourse; Ehud Barak; Israel; negotiation; Palestine; peer teaching; power relations; problem-solving theory; Robert Cox; simulation; Yasser Arafat (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878112456252 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:simgam:v:44:y:2013:i:1:p:134-150
DOI: 10.1177/1046878112456252
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Simulation & Gaming
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().