Gaming and Simulation for Railway Innovation

Jop van den Hoogen and Sebastiaan Meijer

Simulation & Gaming, 2015, vol. 46, issue 5, 489-511

Abstract: Background. Gaming simulation allows decision-makers to experiment with sociotechnical systems , similar to computer simulation. However, the value of these tools in comparison with each other remains uncertain , especially when focusing on their real-life application in systemic innovation processes. Aim. This article builds a framework based on the literature related to innovation of complex systems in a multi-actor environment and intends to use this framework to differentiate between the value of computer simulation and gaming simulation in innovation processes. Method. Using a case study of the introduction of gaming simulation to ProRail, the Dutch railway infrastructure manager, this article explores the advantages and disadvantages of using the two tools in situations where radical innovations need to be invented, explored, tested, and implemented in an incumbent system. Results. Computer simulations , as closed exercises, allow for more radical innovations to be studied. The openness of gaming sessions as well as the need for gamers to interact with a recognizable system inhibit the use of gaming simulation in envisioning radical innovations. However, they are more suitable for the joint commissioning of research and the stepwise testing of small-scale improvements. Gaming simulation is therefore a more appropriate tool for planning a concerted transition in a multi-actor setting. Conclusion. Computer simulation better allows for the building of experimental niches , and gaming simulation better helps in the concerted planning of the implementation of innovations. The article ends with concrete directions for further research as well as ideas about combining the two tools.

Keywords: Complex systems; computer simulation; debriefing; decision support; experimental niches; gaming for research; gaming simulation; infrastructure management; innovation; networked infrastructures; path dependence; railway infrastructure; railway innovation; railway networks; serious gaming; sociotechnical systems; sociotechnical transitions; technology landscapes (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878114549001 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:simgam:v:46:y:2015:i:5:p:489-511

DOI: 10.1177/1046878114549001

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Simulation & Gaming
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().