The contents of partnership agreements in Britain 1990-2007
Peter Samuel and
Nicolas Bacon
Additional contact information
Peter Samuel: Nottingham University Business School, peter.samuel@nottingham.ac.uk
Nicolas Bacon: Nottingham University Business School, nicholas.bacon@nottingham.ac.uk
Work, Employment & Society, 2010, vol. 24, issue 3, 430-448
Abstract:
This article assesses the contents of the majority of employer-union partnership agreements signed in Britain from 1990 to 2007. Few agreements contain the expected partnership principles and most express modest overall aims and limited ambition. Typical agreements are substantively hollow with more than one-third containing no substantive provisions; and procedurally biased, with more than four-fifths offering unions greater involvement in employers’ decisions. Partnership agreements continue the procedural bias of traditional British collective agreements representing the lowest common denominator of agreement — unions work towards the success of the enterprise in return for involvement in employers’ decisions. The implications for New Labour’s Third Way approach and the policy of encouraging voluntary partnership agreements to promote fairness at work are considered.
Keywords: industrial relations; mutual gains; New Labour; partnership; Third Way; trade unions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017010371646 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:woemps:v:24:y:2010:i:3:p:430-448
DOI: 10.1177/0950017010371646
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Work, Employment & Society from British Sociological Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().