Not all that it might seem: why job satisfaction is worth studying despite it being a poor summary measure of job quality

Andrew Brown, Andy Charlwood and David A Spencer
Additional contact information
Andrew Brown: University of Leeds, UK
Andy Charlwood: University of York, UK
David A Spencer: University of Leeds, UK

Work, Employment & Society, 2012, vol. 26, issue 6, 1007-1018

Abstract: Interest in data on job satisfaction is increasing in both academic and policy circles. One common way of interpreting these data is to see a positive association between job satisfaction and job quality. Another view is to dismiss the usefulness of job satisfaction data, because workers can often express satisfaction with work where job quality is poor. It is argued that this second view has some validity, but that survey data on job satisfaction and subjective well-being at work are informative if interpreted carefully. If researchers are to come to sensible conclusions about the meaning behind job satisfaction data, information about why workers report job satisfaction is needed. It is in the understanding of why workers report feeling satisfied (or dissatisfied) with their jobs that sociology can make a positive contribution.

Keywords: job quality; job satisfaction; subjective well-being (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://wes.sagepub.com/content/26/6/1007.abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:woemps:v:26:y:2012:i:6:p:1007-1018

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Work, Employment & Society from British Sociological Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().