Can Dirty Work be Satisfying? A Mixed Method Study of Workers Doing Dirty Jobs

Stephen Deery, Deanna Kolar and Janet Walsh
Additional contact information
Stephen Deery: King’s College London, UK
Deanna Kolar: Purdue University, USA
Janet Walsh: King’s College London, UK

Work, Employment & Society, 2019, vol. 33, issue 4, 631-647

Abstract: It has been argued in this journal that sociologists can make an important contribution to the understanding of why workers report feeling satisfied with their work, particularly where job quality is poor. Utilising a mixed method approach, this article explores how employees derive satisfaction from dirty work. The term ‘dirty work’ refers to tasks and occupations that are perceived as disgusting, distasteful or degrading. The research was conducted among workers specialising in the cleaning of abandoned social or public housing apartments in high crime areas in the UK and the USA. The study identifies a number of different mechanisms through which workers are able to make work both more satisfying and establish a sense of self-worth from the tasks they perform, even though dirt and physical taint are central to the job.

Keywords: dirty work; social relationships; task variety; work group autonomy; work satisfaction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017018817307 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:woemps:v:33:y:2019:i:4:p:631-647

DOI: 10.1177/0950017018817307

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Work, Employment & Society from British Sociological Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().