When Following the Rules Is Bad for Wellbeing: The Effects of Gendered Rules in the Australian Construction Industry

Natalie Galea, Abigail Powell, Fanny Salignac, Louise Chappell and Martin Loosemore
Additional contact information
Natalie Galea: UNSW Sydney, Australia
Abigail Powell: University of Lincoln, UK
Fanny Salignac: Kedge Business School, France
Louise Chappell: UNSW Sydney, Australia
Martin Loosemore: University of Technology Sydney, Australia

Work, Employment & Society, 2022, vol. 36, issue 1, 119-138

Abstract: The construction industry is known to be highly masculinised and to have work practices detrimental to employees’ wellbeing. Drawing on feminist institutional theory and a rapid ethnographic approach in two construction multinationals in Australia, we examine the relationship between the gendered nature of construction and workplace wellbeing for professional women and men employed in the industry. The findings reveal that adhering to the gendered ‘rules in use’ in the construction industry is negatively associated with wellbeing and is usually endured in silence. We also identify the ways in which the gendered rules have different effects on the wellbeing of men and women. We conclude that the construction industry is characterised by a set of ‘greedy’ gendered institutions that are inextricably linked to workplace wellbeing for both men and women and that these rules must be broken to improve worker wellbeing.

Keywords: construction industry; feminist institutionalism; gender; ‘greedy institutions’; workplace wellbeing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017020978914 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:woemps:v:36:y:2022:i:1:p:119-138

DOI: 10.1177/0950017020978914

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Work, Employment & Society from British Sociological Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().