Fields, Frames and Fundamental Rights: The Campaign to Elevate Occupational Safety and Health at the International Labour Organization (ILO)
Vicente Silva and
Huw Thomas
Additional contact information
Vicente Silva: University College London, UK
Huw Thomas: University College Dublin, Ireland
Work, Employment & Society, 2025, vol. 39, issue 4, 904-926
Abstract:
This article focuses on how unions mobilise collective action in the strategic action field of global labour governance. Few studies show how unions take advantage of global governance institutions. To address this, we analyse the 25-year-long campaign to elevate occupational safety and health to a Fundamental Principle and Right at Work at the International Labour Organization (ILO). Building on social movement theory (SMT), we argue that the elevation was made possible through the framing strategies deployed by the workers’ group that were able to mobilise support from governments, and actors external to the ILO, thus demobilising the employers. In drawing on rich qualitative data, our findings extend SMT by analysing how unions externally frame their demands at the supranational level and the context in which framing occurs.
Keywords: framing; global labour governance; International Labour Organization; occupational safety and health; social movement theory; strategic action field; unions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170241309584 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:904-926
DOI: 10.1177/09500170241309584
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Work, Employment & Society from British Sociological Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().