EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Patents, R&D subsidies, and endogenous market structure in a schumpeterian economy

Angus Chu (), Yuichi Furukawa () and Lei Ji ()
Additional contact information
Lei Ji: Department of Strategy, Entrepreneurship & Economics, SKEMA Business School; and OFCE SciencesPo, Sophia Antipolis, France

Southern Economic Journal, 2016, vol. 82, issue 3, 809-825

Abstract: This study explores the different implications of patent breadth and R&D subsidies on economic growth and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian growth model. We find that when the number of firms is fixed in the short run, patent breadth and R&D subsidies serve to increase economic growth as in previous studies. However, when market structure adjusts endogenously in the long run, R&D subsidies increase economic growth but decrease the number of firms, whereas patent breadth expands the number of firms but reduces economic growth. Therefore, in accordance with empirical evidence, R&D subsidy is perhaps a more suitable policy instrument than patent breadth for the purpose of stimulating long-run economic growth.

JEL-codes: O30 O40 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/soej.12122

Related works:
Working Paper: Patents RD subsidies and endogenous market structure in a Schumpeterian economy (2013) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:82:3:y:2016:p:809-825

Access Statistics for this article

Southern Economic Journal is currently edited by Laura Razzolini

More articles in Southern Economic Journal from Southern Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Laura Razzolini ().

 
Page updated 2017-10-06
Handle: RePEc:sej:ancoec:v:82:3:y:2016:p:809-825