Economics at your fingertips  

Is HICP really harmonized? Problems with quality adjustments and new products

Jakub Rybacki, Tamara Bińczak and Filip Kaczmarek
Additional contact information
Tamara Bińczak: Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis
Filip Kaczmarek: Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis

Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, 2018, issue 53, 97-116

Abstract: The problem of accurate inflation measurement is far more frequently raised in the USA than in the European Union (EU). In 1996 the Boskin Commission identified four sources of the potential biases in the Consumer prices index (CPI) calculation related to the substitution of products and outlets, treatment of new products (entering the consumer basket some lag) and the quality adjustment. Similar problems are visible in the EU with even greater magnitude, especially when it comes to the latter factor. Currently, the Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) methodology does not ensure standardization of quality adjustment process, new products entry or the analysis of missing prices. As a result, significant cross-country differences are observed. Based on the principal component analysis (PCA) we have identified major idiosyncratic deviations in the prices of most volatile categories. We found that Poland’s and Ireland’s annual HICP dynamics is downward biased by respectively 0.3 pp and 0.2 pp due to the inaccurate calculation of clothing prices. On the other hand, Austrian and Norwegian figures are upward biased by 0.1 pp on the telecommunication equipment. Finally, we have observed strong dispersions in dynamics of consumer electronics prices. Such differences account for 0.08 pp (information processing equipment) and 0.06 pp (sound recording and processing equipment) of unjustified disparity in the annual HICP inflation between countries with the highest and the lowest dynamics.

Keywords: HICP; quality adjustment; hedonic regression; new goods bias; seasonal products treatment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E31 C5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals is currently edited by Joanna Plebaniak, Beata Czarnacka-Chrobot

More articles in Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals from Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michał Bernardelli ().

Page updated 2019-11-21
Handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:53:y:2018:p:97-116