EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Power analysis for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test for the number of classes in latent class models

Fetene B. Tekle (), Dereje W. Gudicha and Jeroen K. Vermunt
Additional contact information
Fetene B. Tekle: Janssen Research and Development
Dereje W. Gudicha: Tilburg University
Jeroen K. Vermunt: Tilburg University

Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 2016, vol. 10, issue 2, No 6, 209-224

Abstract: Abstract Latent class (LC) analysis is used to construct empirical evidence on the existence of latent subgroups based on the associations among a set of observed discrete variables. One of the tests used to infer about the number of underlying subgroups is the bootstrap likelihood ratio test (BLRT). Although power analysis is rarely conducted for this test, it is important to identify, clarify, and specify the design issues that influence the statistical inference on the number of latent classes based on the BLRT. This paper proposes a computationally efficient ‘short-cut’ method to evaluate the power of the BLRT, as well as presents a procedure to determine a required sample size to attain a specific power level. Results of our numerical study showed that this short-cut method yields reliable estimates of the power of the BLRT. The numerical study also showed that the sample size required to achieve a specified power level depends on various factors of which the class separation plays a dominant role. In some situations, a sample size of 200 may be enough, while in others 2000 or more subjects are required to achieve the required power.

Keywords: Bootstrap; Latent class models; Likelihood ratio test; Power; Sample size; 62F03 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11634-016-0251-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:advdac:v:10:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11634-016-0251-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ds/journal/11634/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11634-016-0251-0

Access Statistics for this article

Advances in Data Analysis and Classification is currently edited by H.-H. Bock, W. Gaul, A. Okada, M. Vichi and C. Weihs

More articles in Advances in Data Analysis and Classification from Springer, German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl), Japanese Classification Society (JCS), Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG), International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:advdac:v:10:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11634-016-0251-0