Subgroup identification in individual participant data meta-analysis using model-based recursive partitioning

Cynthia Huber (), Norbert Benda and Tim Friede
Additional contact information
Cynthia Huber: University Medical Center Göttingen
Norbert Benda: University Medical Center Göttingen
Tim Friede: University Medical Center Göttingen

Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 2022, vol. 16, issue 3, No 11, 797-815

Abstract: Abstract Model-based recursive partitioning (MOB) can be used to identify subgroups with differing treatment effects. The detection rate of treatment-by-covariate interactions and the accuracy of identified subgroups using MOB depend strongly on the sample size. Using data from multiple randomized controlled clinical trials can overcome the problem of too small samples. However, naively pooling data from multiple trials may result in the identification of spurious subgroups as differences in study design, subject selection and other sources of between-trial heterogeneity are ignored. In order to account for between-trial heterogeneity in individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis random-effect models are frequently used. Commonly, heterogeneity in the treatment effect is modelled using random effects whereas heterogeneity in the baseline risks is modelled by either fixed effects or random effects. In this article, we propose metaMOB, a procedure using the generalized mixed-effects model tree (GLMM tree) algorithm for subgroup identification in IPD meta-analysis. Although the application of metaMOB is potentially wider, e.g. randomized experiments with participants in social sciences or preclinical experiments in life sciences, we focus on randomized controlled clinical trials. In a simulation study, metaMOB outperformed GLMM trees assuming a random intercept only and model-based recursive partitioning (MOB), whose algorithm is the basis for GLMM trees, with respect to the false discovery rates, accuracy of identified subgroups and accuracy of estimated treatment effect. The most robust and therefore most promising method is metaMOB with fixed effects for modelling the between-trial heterogeneity in the baseline risks.

Keywords: Model-based recursive partitioning; Subgroup identification; Meta-analysis; Individual participant data; IPD; Treatment-by subgroup interaction; Personalized medicine; 62P10; 62-07 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11634-021-00458-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:advdac:v:16:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s11634-021-00458-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ds/journal/11634/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11634-021-00458-3

Access Statistics for this article

Advances in Data Analysis and Classification is currently edited by H.-H. Bock, W. Gaul, A. Okada, M. Vichi and C. Weihs

More articles in Advances in Data Analysis and Classification from Springer, German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl), Japanese Classification Society (JCS), Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG), International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().