Aligning agricultural policy: discrepancies between public and farmer priorities

Nadja El Benni (), Robert Finger (), Jeanine Ammann (), Judith Irek (), Antonia Kaiser (), Christian Ritzel (), Yanbing Wang () and Gabriele Mack ()
Additional contact information
Nadja El Benni: Sustainability Assessment and Agricultural Management Research Division
Robert Finger: ETH Zurich
Jeanine Ammann: Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group
Judith Irek: Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group
Antonia Kaiser: Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group
Christian Ritzel: Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group
Yanbing Wang: Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group
Gabriele Mack: Economic Modelling and Policy Analysis Group

Agricultural and Food Economics, 2025, vol. 13, issue 1, 1-10

Abstract: Abstract Agricultural policy in Europe is the subject of extensive debate due to the unmet agri-environmental goals, despite high levels of support. For example, the public is critical of agriculture’s impact on the environment and animal welfare. At the same time, farmers protest due to low incomes and high bureaucracy. This apparent polarisation may hinder progress in agricultural policy reform, and a more nuanced understanding of the perceptions of both non-farmers and farmers is needed. This study systematically compares non-farmers’ and farmers’ preferences and levels of consensus across a comprehensive set of agricultural policy goals using surveys in Switzerland (N = 1668). We also assess the polarisation among farmers, non-farmers, and the entire population. We find consensus and polarisation in the perception of agricultural policy goals among Swiss farmers and the general public. Both prioritise domestic food production and farmers’ income as main policy goals. However, non-farmers put more emphasis on low food prices and agri-environmental goals than farmers. We find strong divides within the farming population, particularly regarding the need to mitigate climate change. Our analysis provides key insights for policymakers. Firstly, the broad consensus on different agricultural policy goals underlines the legitimacy of focusing on multiple objectives that support the multifunctional role of agriculture. Secondly, farmers are not homogeneous but have differing views, particularly regarding environmental objectives, especially those related to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Policies need to take this heterogeneity into account, for example, by more efficient allocation of agri-environmental payments. Thirdly, while farmers and non-farmers generally agree on the importance of securing farmers’ incomes and food production, there are divergent views when it comes to reducing food prices and environmental impacts. Future agricultural policy reforms must find a balance between environmental goals and safeguarding farmers’ incomes, while also ensuring affordable food prices.

Keywords: Consensus; Polarization; Survey; Policy perception; Agriculture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40100-025-00402-5 Abstract (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:agfoec:v:13:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40100-025-00402-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nomics/journal/40100

DOI: 10.1186/s40100-025-00402-5

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural and Food Economics is currently edited by Alessandro Banterle, Liesbeth Dries, Andrea Marchini and Carlo Russo

More articles in Agricultural and Food Economics from Springer, Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().