What difference does income make for Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) members in California? Comparing lower-income and higher-income households

Ryan E. Galt (), Katharine Bradley (), Libby Christensen (), Cindy Fake (), Kate Munden-Dixon (), Natasha Simpson (), Rachel Surls () and Julia Soelen Kim ()
Additional contact information
Ryan E. Galt: University of California, Davis
Katharine Bradley: SIT/World Learning, Inc.
Libby Christensen: Colorado State University
Cindy Fake: University of California Cooperative Extension, Nevada County
Kate Munden-Dixon: University of California, Davis
Natasha Simpson: University of California, Davis
Rachel Surls: University of California Cooperative Extension, Los Angeles County
Julia Soelen Kim: University of California Cooperative Extension, Marin County

Agriculture and Human Values, 2017, vol. 34, issue 2, No 13, 435-452

Abstract: Abstract In the U.S. there has been considerable interest in connecting low-income households to alternative food networks like Community Supported Agriculture (CSA). To learn more about this possibility we conducted a statewide survey of CSA members in California. A total of 1149 members from 41 CSAs responded. Here we answer the research question: How do CSA members’ (1) socioeconomic and demographic backgrounds, (2) household conditions potentially interfering with membership, and (3) CSA membership experiences vary between lower-income households (LIHHs) and higher-income households (HIHHs)? We divided members into LIHHs (making under $50,000 annually) and HIHHs (making over $50,000 annually). We present comparisons of LIHHs’ and HIHHs’ (1) employment, race/ethnicity, household composition and education, use of food support, and enjoyment of food-related activities; (2) conditions interfering with membership and major life events; and (3) sources of information influencing decision to join, reasons for joining, ratings of importance of and satisfaction with various CSA attributes, gaps between importance of and satisfaction with various CSA attributes, valuing of the share and willingness to pay more, and impacts of membership. We find that LIHHs are committed CSA members, often more so than HIHHs, and that CSA members in California are disproportionately white, but that racial disproportionality decreases as incomes increase. We conclude by considering: (1) the economic risks that LIHHs face in CSA membership, (2) the intersection of economic risks with race/ethnicity and cultural coding in CSA; and (3) the possibilities of increasing participation of LIHH in CSA.

Keywords: Community Supported Agriculture; Lower-income households; Higher-income households; Race and ethnicity; Disproportionality; Consumption (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-016-9724-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:34:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s10460-016-9724-1

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10460

DOI: 10.1007/s10460-016-9724-1

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture and Human Values is currently edited by Harvey S. James Jr.

More articles in Agriculture and Human Values from Springer, The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().