From texts to enacting practices: defining fair and equitable research principles for plant genetic resources in West Africa

F. Jankowski (), S. Louafi (), N. A. Kane (), M. Diol (), A. Diao Camara (), J.-L. Pham (), C. Berthouly-Salazar () and A. Barnaud ()
Additional contact information
F. Jankowski: CIRAD, University of Montpellier
S. Louafi: AGAP, CIRAD, University of Montpellier
N. A. Kane: Sénégal – LMI LAPSE
M. Diol: Kaddu Yaraax
A. Diao Camara: ISRA
J.-L. Pham: University of Montpellier, IRD
C. Berthouly-Salazar: University of Montpellier, IRD
A. Barnaud: University of Montpellier, IRD

Agriculture and Human Values, 2020, vol. 37, issue 4, No 11, 1083-1094

Abstract: Abstract Collaborative research practices in the field of plant genetic resources must follow the principles of fairness and equity as defined in the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and in the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA). In this context the concepts of fairness and equity generally refer to the substantive and procedural dimensions associated with sharing the benefits of this research. But neither term is clearly defined by these international treaties, and the meanings attributed to the concepts vary among different societies. This paper looks at the question of how to account for the diversity among value systems when conducting research that implicates diverse stakeholders and respects the requirements of fairness and equity. We incorporated an auto-ethnography method developed as part of a multi-stakeholder network involved in research projects on plant genetic resources in West Africa. A theatrical device was used as a framework for testing the principles of fairness and equity, helping us to collectively identify feelings of injustice, and explore the conditions for making collaborative research practices more ethical in ways that respect the perspectives of different stakeholders. In an environment of extensive political and socio-cognitive inequality, this approach makes it possible to explain the criteria relating to interactional justice and expectations in terms of socio-political and socio-emotional benefits. It also invites us to consider the principles of fairness and equity in a framework of ethical competence that goes beyond international directives.

Keywords: Access and benefit sharing (ABS); Ethics; Interactional justice; Transdisciplinary research; Plant genetic resources; Forum theater (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-020-10039-3 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:37:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s10460-020-10039-3

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10460

DOI: 10.1007/s10460-020-10039-3

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture and Human Values is currently edited by Harvey S. James Jr.

More articles in Agriculture and Human Values from Springer, The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().