The sounds of silence: ‘Pivoting’ as a rhetorical strategy of the animal farming industry to maintain the institution of meat

Estela M. Díaz (), Amparo Merino () and Antonio Nuñez-Partido ()
Additional contact information
Estela M. Díaz: Department of Management, School of Economics and Business Studies, Universidad Pontificia Comillas
Amparo Merino: Department of Management, School of Economics and Business Studies, Universidad Pontificia Comillas
Antonio Nuñez-Partido: Department of Management, School of Economics and Business Studies, Universidad Pontificia Comillas

Agriculture and Human Values, 2025, vol. 42, issue 3, No 52, 2129-2150

Abstract: Abstract This study examines the rhetorical strategies employed in animal agriculture communication to maintain the legitimacy of meat as an institution amidst gwowing ethical concerns about animal welfare and the animal-as-food logic. By analysing the public discourses of the Spanish animal agriculture interbranch organisations, we propose a rhetorical strategy that we call pivoting, which consists of three rhetorical moves: silencing, amplifying, and hollowing. Silencing diverts the audience’s attention from the ethical implications of animal exploitation. In contrast, the credibility and authority of farmers are rhetorically amplified by portraying them as benevolent stewards of cultural values, territories, and societal well-being. Hollowing, in turn, frames animal welfare as merely a good business practice, obscuring the debates about the moral considerations that underpin welfarism and other ethical perspectives on non-human animals. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the role of discourses in shaping the evolving values underpinning animal agriculture, revealing how the lobbying voice of the animal agriculture industry association can stifle divergent moral perspectives about animals within the sector. Additionally, they expand theoretical typologies of institutional work by providing evidence of the rhetorical strategies used to maintain the normative foundations of a societal institution. Furthermore, this study highlights the need to promote a critical understanding of meat production and its ethical implications, challenging the entrenched anthropocentric speciesism within the food system.

Keywords: Animal agriculture; Institutional work; Rhetoric; Livestock industry; Meat; Speciesism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-025-10759-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:42:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10460-025-10759-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10460

DOI: 10.1007/s10460-025-10759-4

Access Statistics for this article

Agriculture and Human Values is currently edited by Harvey S. James Jr.

More articles in Agriculture and Human Values from Springer, The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().