MIMIC models and formative measurement: some thoughts on Lee, Cadogan & Chamberlain

Adamantios Diamantopoulos ()
Additional contact information
Adamantios Diamantopoulos: Harvard University

AMS Review, 2013, vol. 3, issue 1, No 5, 30-37

Abstract: Abstract Several problematic issues in Lee, Cadogan and Chamberlain’s (2013) paper on MIMIC models and formative measurement are identified and discussed. It is argued that MIMIC models can be used with formative measurement specifications and that replacing the formative measurement model with a (non-testable) composite does not contribute to better measurement practice.

Keywords: Formative measurement; Composites; Indicators; MIMIC models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13162-013-0035-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:amsrev:v:3:y:2013:i:1:d:10.1007_s13162-013-0035-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... gement/journal/13162

DOI: 10.1007/s13162-013-0035-z

Access Statistics for this article

AMS Review is currently edited by Manjit S. Yadav

More articles in AMS Review from Springer, Academy of Marketing Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().