EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Impact of Raising Alcohol Taxes on Government Tax Revenue: Insights from Five European Countries

Jakob Manthey (), Inese Gobiņa (), Laura Isajeva (), Jarosław Neneman (), Rainer Reile (), Mindaugas Štelemėkas () and Jürgen Rehm ()
Additional contact information
Jakob Manthey: University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)
Inese Gobiņa: Riga Stradiņš University
Laura Isajeva: Riga Stradiņš University
Jarosław Neneman: University of Lodz
Rainer Reile: National Institute for Health Development
Mindaugas Štelemėkas: Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Jürgen Rehm: University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2024, vol. 22, issue 3, No 8, 363-374

Abstract: Abstract Background and Objective Reducing the affordability of alcoholic beverages by increasing alcohol excise taxation can lead to a reduction in alcohol consumption but the impact on government alcohol excise tax revenue is poorly understood. This study aimed to (a) describe cross-country tax revenue variations and (b) investigate how changes in taxation were related to changes in government tax revenue, using data from Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. Methods For the population aged 15 years or older, we calculated the annual per capita alcohol excise tax revenue, total tax revenue, gross domestic product and alcohol consumption. In addition to descriptive analyses, joinpoint regressions were performed to identify whether changes in alcohol excise taxation were linked to changes in alcohol excise revenue since 1999. Results In 2022, the per capita alcohol excise tax revenue was lowest in Germany (€44.2) and highest in Estonia (€218.4). In all countries, the alcohol excise tax revenue was mostly determined by spirit sales (57–72% of total alcohol tax revenue). During 2010–20, inflation-adjusted per capita alcohol excise tax revenues have declined in Germany (− 22.9%), Poland (− 19.1%) and Estonia (− 4.2%) and increased in Latvia (+ 56.8%) and Lithuania (+ 49.3%). In periods of policy non-action, alcohol consumption and tax revenue showed similar trends, but tax level increases were accompanied by increased revenue and stagnant or decreased consumption. Conclusions Increasing alcohol taxation was not linked to decreased but increased government revenue. Policymakers can increase revenue and reduce alcohol consumption and harm by increasing alcohol taxes.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40258-024-00873-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00873-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/40258

DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00873-5

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy is currently edited by Timothy Wrightson

More articles in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:22:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s40258-024-00873-5