EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Inter-model comparison of hydrological impacts of climate change on the Upper Blue Nile basin using ensemble of hydrological models and global climate models

A. D. Teklesadik (), T. Alemayehu, A. van Griensven, R. Kumar, S. Liersch, S. Eisner, J. Tecklenburg, S. Ewunte and X. Wang
Additional contact information
A. D. Teklesadik: Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
T. Alemayehu: Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
A. van Griensven: Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
R. Kumar: UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
S. Liersch: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
S. Eisner: University of Kassel
J. Tecklenburg: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
S. Ewunte: Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
X. Wang: Hohai University

Climatic Change, 2017, vol. 141, issue 3, No 11, 517-532

Abstract: Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the impacts of future climate change on discharge and evapotranspiration of the Upper Blue Nile (UBN) basin using multiple global circulation models (GCMs) projections and multiple hydrological models (HMs). The uncertainties of projections originating from HMs, GCMs, and representative concentration pathways (RCPs) were also analyzed. This study is part of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP) initiative (phase 2), which is a community driven modeling effort to assess global socio-economic impacts of climate change. The baseline period of 1981–2010 was used to identify climate change signals in two future periods: mid future (2036–2065) and far future (2070–2099). Our analyses showed that two out of four GCMs indicated a statistically significant increase in projected precipitation in the far future period. The projected change in mean annual precipitation varied between 4 and 10% relative to the baseline period. The HMs did not agree on the direction of climate change impacts on mean annual discharge. Furthermore, simulated changes in mean annual discharge by all HMs, except SWIM which simulated up to 6.6% increase for the far future period, were not statistically significant. All the HMs generally simulated a statistically significant increase in annual mean actual evapotranspiration (AET) in both periods. The HMs simulated changes in AET ranging from 1.9 to 4.4% for the far future period. In the UBN basin GCM structure was the main contributor of uncertainty in mean annual discharge projection followed by HM structure and RCPs, respectively. The results from this research suggest to use multiple impact models as well as multiple GCMs to provide a more robust assessment of climate change impacts in the UBN basin.

Keywords: Climate Change Impact; Hydrological Model; Projected Change; Future Period; Annual Discharge (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-017-1913-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:141:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-017-1913-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-1913-4

Access Statistics for this article

Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe

More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:141:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-017-1913-4