Low-emission pathways in 11 major economies: comparison of cost-optimal pathways and Paris climate proposals
Heleen L. van Soest (),
Lara Aleluia Reis,
Laurent Drouet,
Detlef P. van Vuuren,
Michel G. J. den Elzen,
Massimo Tavoni (),
Keigo Akimoto,
Katherine V. Calvin,
Panagiotis Fragkos,
Alban Kitous,
Gunnar Luderer and
Keywan Riahi
Additional contact information
Heleen L. van Soest: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Lara Aleluia Reis: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)
Detlef P. van Vuuren: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Michel G. J. den Elzen: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Keigo Akimoto: Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth
Katherine V. Calvin: 5825 University Research Court
Panagiotis Fragkos: National Technical University of Athens
Alban Kitous: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Unit J1—Economics of Climate Change, Energy and Transport, Edificio Expo
Gunnar Luderer: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)
Keywan Riahi: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Climatic Change, 2017, vol. 142, issue 3, No 14, 504 pages
Abstract:
Abstract In order to evaluate the effectiveness of climate policy, it is important to understand emission trends and policies at the national level. The 2015 Paris Agreement includes (Intended) Nationally Determined Contributions, so-called (I)NDCs, outlining the contribution of different Parties to the overall target of the agreement to limit global mean temperature increase to well below 2 °C. Here, we assess emission trajectories and the energy system transition of 11 major economies (in the remainder: countries) projected by integrated assessment models (IAMs) for baseline and cost-optimal 450 ppm CO2 eq mitigation scenarios and compare the results with the (I)NDCs. Limiting global temperature increase to below 2 °C implies a substantial reduction of the estimated available carbon budget for each country. The national carbon budgets between 2010 and 2100 showed reductions between the baseline and the 2 °C consistent mitigation scenario ranging from 52% in South Korea to 95% in Brazil. While in the baseline scenario, the share of low-carbon primary energy sources is projected to remain around 15% (with Brazil being a notable exception, reaching 30%); in the mitigation scenarios, the share of low-carbon energy is projected to increase to over 50% in 2050 in nearly all countries, with the EU, Japan and Canada reaching the largest shares. Comparison with the (I)NDCs shows that in Brazil, Canada, the EU, Mexico (conditional target), South Korea and the USA, the emission reduction targets of the NDCs are closer to the mitigation requirement of the 2 °C scenario; in other countries, however, there is still a large gap. The national detail of the indicators adds to the literature on low-carbon emission pathways, assists the assessment of the Paris Agreement and provides support to national policymakers to identify focus areas for climate policy in the coming years.
Keywords: Emission Reduction; Climate Policy; Baseline Scenario; Marginal Abatement Cost; Mitigation Scenario (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-017-1964-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:climat:v:142:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-017-1964-6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10584
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-1964-6
Access Statistics for this article
Climatic Change is currently edited by M. Oppenheimer and G. Yohe
More articles in Climatic Change from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().